<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Michael Kammes (.com)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelkammes.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelkammes.com</link>
	<description>Full of tech goodness - workflows, tips, tricks, reviews, and insights into the post production realm</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 04:09:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Getting Final Cut Pro projects and/or media into Avid Media Composer by Matt W</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/editorial/getting-final-cut-pro-projects-andor-media-into-avid-media-composer/comment-page-1/#comment-12706</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 04:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/?p=697#comment-12706</guid>
		<description>I know this is an old thread, but I was wondering how automatic duck does with grouped/multiclipped footage. I&#039;m working on a multi-camera project that we want to migrate from FCP to Avid, but the whole timeline was made with multiclipped footage, and we are wondering if automatic duck can preserve our multiclips, or if it just processes the active angle only. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is an old thread, but I was wondering how automatic duck does with grouped/multiclipped footage. I&#8217;m working on a multi-camera project that we want to migrate from FCP to Avid, but the whole timeline was made with multiclipped footage, and we are wondering if automatic duck can preserve our multiclips, or if it just processes the active angle only. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Video by peketi krisshna mohan</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/post-production/video/comment-page-1/#comment-12635</link>
		<dc:creator>peketi krisshna mohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 03:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/?page_id=242#comment-12635</guid>
		<description>Michael kammes is simply the best.And Michael thank you for your post and your passion for post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael kammes is simply the best.And Michael thank you for your post and your passion for post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avid is Self-Aware &#8211; Fast Import by Michael Kammes</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/encoding/avid-is-self-aware-fast-import/comment-page-1/#comment-12628</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kammes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/?p=1028#comment-12628</guid>
		<description>Thanks Andi!

I was referring to the Video Offloader product Scott had mentioned - Red Cine-X has been in my tool box for some time :)

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Andi!</p>
<p>I was referring to the Video Offloader product Scott had mentioned &#8211; Red Cine-X has been in my tool box for some time <img src='http://michaelkammes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Play Avid MXF for Free by Andi Loor</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/avid/play-avid-mxf-for-free/comment-page-1/#comment-12626</link>
		<dc:creator>Andi Loor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/?p=1159#comment-12626</guid>
		<description>Another easy way to watch mxf files is to install the free Avid MetaFuze utility and scan the mxf folders
Andi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another easy way to watch mxf files is to install the free Avid MetaFuze utility and scan the mxf folders<br />
Andi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avid is Self-Aware &#8211; Fast Import by Andi Loor</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/encoding/avid-is-self-aware-fast-import/comment-page-1/#comment-12625</link>
		<dc:creator>Andi Loor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/?p=1028#comment-12625</guid>
		<description>For your information: Red Cine X is a utility to handle Red Raw files and can be found at www.red.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For your information: Red Cine X is a utility to handle Red Raw files and can be found at <a href="http://www.red.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.red.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avid is Self-Aware &#8211; Fast Import by Michael Kammes</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/encoding/avid-is-self-aware-fast-import/comment-page-1/#comment-12613</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kammes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/?p=1028#comment-12613</guid>
		<description>5D footage is H.264. H.264 is an acquisition codec – not editorial. While Avid can use this natively (v5 and v6), the editing experience may not be “pleasurable”. H.264 can be difficult for computers to play, and thus you may experience playback issues like stuttering, etc. when playing multiple streams or on an older computer. Converting the footage to DNxHD ensures that you are using a codec that not only plays easier, but holds up better after subsequent FX, renders, and export.

In v6, you can do this same fast import trick with ProRes footage which is excellent.. The same holds true – 709 is the correct color space.

Good Luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5D footage is H.264. H.264 is an acquisition codec – not editorial. While Avid can use this natively (v5 and v6), the editing experience may not be “pleasurable”. H.264 can be difficult for computers to play, and thus you may experience playback issues like stuttering, etc. when playing multiple streams or on an older computer. Converting the footage to DNxHD ensures that you are using a codec that not only plays easier, but holds up better after subsequent FX, renders, and export.</p>
<p>In v6, you can do this same fast import trick with ProRes footage which is excellent.. The same holds true – 709 is the correct color space.</p>
<p>Good Luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avid is Self-Aware &#8211; Fast Import by aleigh</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/encoding/avid-is-self-aware-fast-import/comment-page-1/#comment-12540</link>
		<dc:creator>aleigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 01:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/?p=1028#comment-12540</guid>
		<description>HI. I am a confused first time avid user! I am an expert FCP user but trying to learn Avid while editing a short film. I am working with all 5D footage which I converted to prores. Is it necessary though to convert it to DNxHD?? I am using the free trial download of 5.5 and then planning on using the free trial of 6. 

If using the prores footage, should I set the color space to YCbCr 709 or RGB? 

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI. I am a confused first time avid user! I am an expert FCP user but trying to learn Avid while editing a short film. I am working with all 5D footage which I converted to prores. Is it necessary though to convert it to DNxHD?? I am using the free trial download of 5.5 and then planning on using the free trial of 6. </p>
<p>If using the prores footage, should I set the color space to YCbCr 709 or RGB? </p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tech Note: Avid and Volume Sizes by Michael test</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/editorial/tech-note-avid-and-volume-sizes/comment-page-1/#comment-12291</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/column/?p=12#comment-12291</guid>
		<description>test post 1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test post 1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Getting Final Cut Pro projects and/or media into Avid Media Composer by Susy</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/editorial/getting-final-cut-pro-projects-andor-media-into-avid-media-composer/comment-page-1/#comment-11354</link>
		<dc:creator>Susy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 23:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/?p=697#comment-11354</guid>
		<description>Hahahaha. I\&#039;m not too brghit today. Great post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahahaha. I\&#8217;m not too brghit today. Great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tech Note:  QT References with Media Composer 3.5 by Kaylan</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/editorial/tech-note-qt-references-with-media-composer-35/comment-page-1/#comment-11306</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/column/?p=59#comment-11306</guid>
		<description>Appirecaiton for this information is over 9000thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appirecaiton for this information is over 9000thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Prepping and Exporting for Post Audio in Final Cut Pro by Paulina</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/audio/prepping-and-exporting-for-post-audio-in-final-cut-pro/comment-page-1/#comment-10944</link>
		<dc:creator>Paulina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 02:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/?p=720#comment-10944</guid>
		<description>Very helpful information. Incredible all this info in one page! My sound guy is asking me the OMF files and my composer is asking the time code window burn with academy leader. I had no idea what they were talking about, now I do. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very helpful information. Incredible all this info in one page! My sound guy is asking me the OMF files and my composer is asking the time code window burn with academy leader. I had no idea what they were talking about, now I do. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avid is Self-Aware &#8211; Fast Import by Michael Kammes</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/encoding/avid-is-self-aware-fast-import/comment-page-1/#comment-10734</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kammes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 03:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/?p=1028#comment-10734</guid>
		<description>Yes, it does.

Sadly, it&#039;s is very expensive ($20,000+ for a turnkey system at last check) and is tricky with all metadata being passed.  It does work well in enterprise installations, however.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it does.</p>
<p>Sadly, it&#8217;s is very expensive ($20,000+ for a turnkey system at last check) and is tricky with all metadata being passed.  It does work well in enterprise installations, however.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avid is Self-Aware &#8211; Fast Import by Vladimir Pavlovski</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/encoding/avid-is-self-aware-fast-import/comment-page-1/#comment-10729</link>
		<dc:creator>Vladimir Pavlovski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/?p=1028#comment-10729</guid>
		<description>Rhozet Carbon Coder on Windows transcodes almost any media to Avid DV, DNxHD MXF media with AAF. Then just drag and drop. No need for fast import.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rhozet Carbon Coder on Windows transcodes almost any media to Avid DV, DNxHD MXF media with AAF. Then just drag and drop. No need for fast import.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avid is Self-Aware &#8211; Fast Import by Michael Kammes</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/encoding/avid-is-self-aware-fast-import/comment-page-1/#comment-10588</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kammes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/?p=1028#comment-10588</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t quite follow.  We can examine the codec (i.e. how the video is encoded) - but as far as which *program* created it - those are 2 different things.

I use &quot;Media Info&quot; quite often, and Google will show variants for Mac and PC.  The program which created the file - that&#039;s up to the software to leave a marker embedded in the file, which I rarely see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t quite follow.  We can examine the codec (i.e. how the video is encoded) &#8211; but as far as which *program* created it &#8211; those are 2 different things.</p>
<p>I use &#8220;Media Info&#8221; quite often, and Google will show variants for Mac and PC.  The program which created the file &#8211; that&#8217;s up to the software to leave a marker embedded in the file, which I rarely see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avid is Self-Aware &#8211; Fast Import by Jim Mahan</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/encoding/avid-is-self-aware-fast-import/comment-page-1/#comment-10586</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Mahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/?p=1028#comment-10586</guid>
		<description>Is there a way to determine the details of a DNxHD file. (ie which codec was used to create it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a way to determine the details of a DNxHD file. (ie which codec was used to create it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avid Media Composer &amp; Symphony 6.0 and You: New Features by Peter</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/avid/avid-media-composer-symphony-6-0-and-you-new-features/comment-page-1/#comment-10527</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 23:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/?p=1662#comment-10527</guid>
		<description>I very much agree, they are laying a foundation for the future. Modernizing old codebases that have grown over such a long time is a huge undertaking that most users severely underestimate, and I applaud Avid for making it such a seamless experience.

I&#039;d argue that surround mixing and the RTAS plugins do more in the way of cannibalizing the ProTools market than sample-accurate editing would. I&#039;d just like to be able to fine-tune sync better (always enabling the &quot;Film&quot; option by default to have perf-slipping available is just ridiculous) and have the option to seamlessly blend audio recordings for the same shot from that were recorded on different recording devices with different microphones and stuff like that.

I completely agree about 3D, those features definitely seem like a marketing thing to me. As long as the Media Composer-based systems are not better suited as finishing tools, editing everything in 3D is just a luxury and a potential waste of space and disk bandwidth. At the end of the process everything is conformed in another application anyway. And from what I have heard a good 2D cut usually only needs a few minor adjustments for 3D (never had to do it myself, though). So even if 3D stays, I don&#039;t think the toolset was really needed that desperately, at least in this release and at this point in time.

A big feature for me would have been a scripting interface, which none of the NLEs currently on the market seems to offer. Being able to have a bunch of Python scripts manipulate the media database, fix metadata problems, build timelines in an automated way (for creating dailies and exporting them to different delivery formats, simple repetitive greenscreen composites and slap comps for VFX shots, creating lower thirds based on metadata/markers/databases etc.), adding bindings for external databases of information (like notes entered into a FileMaker database on location), asset tracking and versioning systems (be it inhouse solutions or off-the-shelf), customized reports and statistics, exchanging color information via CDLs etc. and automating repetitive tasks in general and getting data in and out of the application would most likely have been quite useful to a lot of people. But maybe next time.

Anyway, I completely agree, Version 6 looks like a great release and I am very happy that Avid is getting so much attention back with the whole Final Cut X debacle. Having a nice, fast and responsive GPU accelerated application that renders things instantly (Premiere Pro, Final Cut X) is one thing, but that is all completely worthless if the software doesn&#039;t let you work fast in terms of ergonomics. Version 6 of Media Composer shows that Avid, unlike other manufacturers, is definitely committed to both these things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I very much agree, they are laying a foundation for the future. Modernizing old codebases that have grown over such a long time is a huge undertaking that most users severely underestimate, and I applaud Avid for making it such a seamless experience.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d argue that surround mixing and the RTAS plugins do more in the way of cannibalizing the ProTools market than sample-accurate editing would. I&#8217;d just like to be able to fine-tune sync better (always enabling the &#8220;Film&#8221; option by default to have perf-slipping available is just ridiculous) and have the option to seamlessly blend audio recordings for the same shot from that were recorded on different recording devices with different microphones and stuff like that.</p>
<p>I completely agree about 3D, those features definitely seem like a marketing thing to me. As long as the Media Composer-based systems are not better suited as finishing tools, editing everything in 3D is just a luxury and a potential waste of space and disk bandwidth. At the end of the process everything is conformed in another application anyway. And from what I have heard a good 2D cut usually only needs a few minor adjustments for 3D (never had to do it myself, though). So even if 3D stays, I don&#8217;t think the toolset was really needed that desperately, at least in this release and at this point in time.</p>
<p>A big feature for me would have been a scripting interface, which none of the NLEs currently on the market seems to offer. Being able to have a bunch of Python scripts manipulate the media database, fix metadata problems, build timelines in an automated way (for creating dailies and exporting them to different delivery formats, simple repetitive greenscreen composites and slap comps for VFX shots, creating lower thirds based on metadata/markers/databases etc.), adding bindings for external databases of information (like notes entered into a FileMaker database on location), asset tracking and versioning systems (be it inhouse solutions or off-the-shelf), customized reports and statistics, exchanging color information via CDLs etc. and automating repetitive tasks in general and getting data in and out of the application would most likely have been quite useful to a lot of people. But maybe next time.</p>
<p>Anyway, I completely agree, Version 6 looks like a great release and I am very happy that Avid is getting so much attention back with the whole Final Cut X debacle. Having a nice, fast and responsive GPU accelerated application that renders things instantly (Premiere Pro, Final Cut X) is one thing, but that is all completely worthless if the software doesn&#8217;t let you work fast in terms of ergonomics. Version 6 of Media Composer shows that Avid, unlike other manufacturers, is definitely committed to both these things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avid Media Composer &amp; Symphony 6.0 and You: New Features by Michael Kammes</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/avid/avid-media-composer-symphony-6-0-and-you-new-features/comment-page-1/#comment-10526</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kammes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 22:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/?p=1662#comment-10526</guid>
		<description>Thanks Peter!

I think a big takeaway is that Avid has just crossed the 64bit threshold.  This will NOW enable Avid to possibly develop for 2K, 4K, 5K +, (e.g. resolution agnostic) background rendering, etc.  Crawl before you walk, eh?

Avid has the 800lb Gorilla: Pro Tools.  What is the hurry to cannibalize their audio product by giving sample accurate editing in MC?  Companies routinely cannibalize from their other products - but they tend to do it slowly to get as much life (and money) out of them as possible.

What Avid has done from 5.5 to 6 is massive.  All your points are on my wish list, but I&#039;m satisfied with the featureset in this release.  My only concern is that the amount of work poured into 3D may be for naught if an easier distribution and viewing method isn&#039;t done soon...3D will be another fad...again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Peter!</p>
<p>I think a big takeaway is that Avid has just crossed the 64bit threshold.  This will NOW enable Avid to possibly develop for 2K, 4K, 5K +, (e.g. resolution agnostic) background rendering, etc.  Crawl before you walk, eh?</p>
<p>Avid has the 800lb Gorilla: Pro Tools.  What is the hurry to cannibalize their audio product by giving sample accurate editing in MC?  Companies routinely cannibalize from their other products &#8211; but they tend to do it slowly to get as much life (and money) out of them as possible.</p>
<p>What Avid has done from 5.5 to 6 is massive.  All your points are on my wish list, but I&#8217;m satisfied with the featureset in this release.  My only concern is that the amount of work poured into 3D may be for naught if an easier distribution and viewing method isn&#8217;t done soon&#8230;3D will be another fad&#8230;again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avid Media Composer &amp; Symphony 6.0 and You: New Features by Peter</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/avid/avid-media-composer-symphony-6-0-and-you-new-features/comment-page-1/#comment-10525</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 22:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/?p=1662#comment-10525</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much, great and very informative article!

Seems like some of my biggest wishes seem to not have come true: background importing/exporting, sample-accurate audio editing, playback not being stopped by every single UI action (eg. bringing the markers window to the foreground),  a real color grading solution and workflow rather than the limited built-in color corrector (something like Apple Color used to be, but with a more efficient interface like Lustre or Baselight), or a move away from the rigid format requirements (like support for totally arbitrary sizes and frame rates up to 4K for both the editing software als well as the DNxHD codecs). But it still looks like a great update that is certainly moving in the right direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much, great and very informative article!</p>
<p>Seems like some of my biggest wishes seem to not have come true: background importing/exporting, sample-accurate audio editing, playback not being stopped by every single UI action (eg. bringing the markers window to the foreground),  a real color grading solution and workflow rather than the limited built-in color corrector (something like Apple Color used to be, but with a more efficient interface like Lustre or Baselight), or a move away from the rigid format requirements (like support for totally arbitrary sizes and frame rates up to 4K for both the editing software als well as the DNxHD codecs). But it still looks like a great update that is certainly moving in the right direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avid Media Composer &amp; Symphony 6.0 and You: New Features by Ed Marx</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/avid/avid-media-composer-symphony-6-0-and-you-new-features/comment-page-1/#comment-10520</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Marx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/?p=1662#comment-10520</guid>
		<description>thank you a thousand times over!
yesterday&#039;s avid webisode was so sales aggressive, it seems they forgot that us owner types just want the info.

more, more more please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you a thousand times over!<br />
yesterday&#8217;s avid webisode was so sales aggressive, it seems they forgot that us owner types just want the info.</p>
<p>more, more more please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avid Media Composer &amp; Symphony 6.0 and You: New Features by Michael Kammes</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/avid/avid-media-composer-symphony-6-0-and-you-new-features/comment-page-1/#comment-10517</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kammes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/?p=1662#comment-10517</guid>
		<description>Thanks for listening!

3rd party I/O is supported - not UI.  You can launch the UI of the I/O control panel from Media Composer...but that&#039;s about it - no other UI that I am aware of.

Hopefully something wasn&#039;t lost via the phone connection!

~MIchael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for listening!</p>
<p>3rd party I/O is supported &#8211; not UI.  You can launch the UI of the I/O control panel from Media Composer&#8230;but that&#8217;s about it &#8211; no other UI that I am aware of.</p>
<p>Hopefully something wasn&#8217;t lost via the phone connection!</p>
<p>~MIchael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avid Media Composer &amp; Symphony 6.0 and You: New Features by Jeppe Svendsen</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/avid/avid-media-composer-symphony-6-0-and-you-new-features/comment-page-1/#comment-10513</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeppe Svendsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 08:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/?p=1662#comment-10513</guid>
		<description>I just listened to you in the Buzz podcast and could not get my arms down (big problem since I was driving ;) ), because I got the impression that third party UI was now fully supported. Like colorista has its 3-way color corrector inside Premiere Pro. Did I misunderstand something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just listened to you in the Buzz podcast and could not get my arms down (big problem since I was driving <img src='http://michaelkammes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ), because I got the impression that third party UI was now fully supported. Like colorista has its 3-way color corrector inside Premiere Pro. Did I misunderstand something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avid Media Composer &amp; Symphony 6.0 and You: New Features by Tom Dagion</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/avid/avid-media-composer-symphony-6-0-and-you-new-features/comment-page-1/#comment-10503</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Dagion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/?p=1662#comment-10503</guid>
		<description>Thank you Michael. To bad Avid didnt just post this at their webcast instead of burying us in PR bullshit. Nice job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Michael. To bad Avid didnt just post this at their webcast instead of burying us in PR bullshit. Nice job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Getting Final Cut Pro projects and/or media into Avid Media Composer by Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Migrating Media (and Projects) from FCP to Avid</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/editorial/getting-final-cut-pro-projects-andor-media-into-avid-media-composer/comment-page-1/#comment-10048</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Migrating Media (and Projects) from FCP to Avid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 09:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/?p=697#comment-10048</guid>
		<description>[...] http://michaelkammes.com/editorial/getting-final-cut-pro-projects-andor-media-into-avid-media-compos... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://michaelkammes.com/editorial/getting-final-cut-pro-projects-andor-media-into-avid-media-compos.." rel="nofollow">http://michaelkammes.com/editorial/getting-final-cut-pro-projects-andor-media-into-avid-media-compos..</a>. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Getting Final Cut Pro projects and/or media into Avid Media Composer by Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NLE Handling of 10-Bit Recordings</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/editorial/getting-final-cut-pro-projects-andor-media-into-avid-media-composer/comment-page-1/#comment-10047</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NLE Handling of 10-Bit Recordings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 09:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/?p=697#comment-10047</guid>
		<description>[...] http://michaelkammes.com/editorial/getting-final-cut-pro-projects-andor-media-into-avid-media-compos... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://michaelkammes.com/editorial/getting-final-cut-pro-projects-andor-media-into-avid-media-compos.." rel="nofollow">http://michaelkammes.com/editorial/getting-final-cut-pro-projects-andor-media-into-avid-media-compos..</a>. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Play Avid MXF for Free by Michael Kammes</title>
		<link>http://michaelkammes.com/avid/play-avid-mxf-for-free/comment-page-1/#comment-9835</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kammes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkammes.com/?p=1159#comment-9835</guid>
		<description>You must create this folder and place the files within it.  The batch file is looking for this path.

~Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You must create this folder and place the files within it.  The batch file is looking for this path.</p>
<p>~Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.michaelkammes.com/comments/feed/ ) in 1.90761 seconds, on Feb 23rd, 2012 at 2:09 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 23rd, 2012 at 3:09 am UTC -->
